I'm an actual lover from the H4831 powder. I get good velocity and accuracy away from any caliber I've experimented with it in. Through the twenty five-06 up to the 338 it is my drop by powder of choice. I check out all types of powders when Doing work up loads, though the H4831 usually seems to come out on leading for accuracy and velocity when the case is with the 06 class or larger sized.

H4831 will get the job done during the Swift although not serious well. You will under no circumstances receive the pressures you may need for consistency Together with the .223. 760, or H414 is going to be superior but for a few explanation I ain't the biggest fan of most ball powders.

The truth that the H4831 is indeed a slower burning powder is specifically why you are seeing better velocities obtained with that powder, versus Whatever you've noticed with the IMR things. Also great powder, but fairly better suited to a little smaller sized conditions by using a bit a lot less capability.

With all the 154 grain Hornady SP while in the 280, H4831 gave me superior teams and great velocity, but Rottweil R905 contains a considerably larger velocity and supplies marginally improved precision. With Swift a hundred and fifty grain Sciroccos in the 7mm RM, H4831SC gave great precision and velocity, but RL22 was marginally better. Consequently, in Every of these circumstances I went with One more powder, but I would definitely despise to divest myself of the H4831.

Yup or it will not likely perform well. And For the reason that OP features a load working with Varget I'd test to discover another person to trade with. Might come up with a get acquire problem.

I've utilized H4831 and H4831SC in my 260 Rem without any variation. The one thing could be the shorter cut gives you a little more space. Great luck!gun)

I am making use of it which has a 210 Berger. In my rifle, H1000 was not as correct. RL22 did perfectly but I was somewhat concerned about temp security. h4831sc load data I think I'm at 72 grains and obtain around 2850ish fps

Like said earlier mentioned, exact same things. Everything is different is the dimensions on the kernels. I did listen to somewhere that they're going to only make the SC Later on. I have no idea if that is h4831 vs h4831sc real or not but would seem sensible to me. I use SC mainly because that's what I present in the eight lb jug and it really works.

You could possibly: 1) Go on and have the firearm(s) mentioned beneath quickly faraway from your shopping cart:

locutus explained: I even now have an excellent stockpile of H450, the ball powder equivalent of 4831, which flows through my powder steps easily.

I've experienced comparable practical experience with H4350. For me, some ball powders will not likely shoot very well with something other than Fed215's. Some factors just Do not Engage in perfectly with other. Looks like you have decided on three good powders, I'd hope a minimum of one of them to shoot.

This really is an Extraordinary extruded propellant and delivers heightened insensitivity to hot and cold temperatures.

Some of the previous Lyman data just stated IMR 4831, which was surplus military powder and now newer mfg as H4831.

I sawed just one in half to view how thick the jackets were being, plus they were being effortlessly two times as thick to be a 50-grain hollow level was. Ditto with the 64-grain Electrical power Place, as these bullets are built for deer, not prairie canines or woodchucks. You now know anything I understand about the 22-250 and slow-burning powders, and I don't know everything in the slightest degree concerning the 223. I doubt that h4831sc you're going to get wherever with that cartridge and 4831, but allow us to understand how it goes.